Sunday, December 20, 2009

Google to Comply With Swiss Court on Street View


comply with an expected Swiss court ruling into whether its Street View web service fails to protect people's privacy by showing their faces and licence plates, the company and Swiss authorities said.

The company is accused of failing to obscure such sensitive images from its photo mapping application sufficiently and setting cameras at a height on filming vehicles that allows them to see over fences, hedges and walls into private property. "Google commits to a final and binding Swiss court decision and to implement it also with regard to images which have already been transmitted outside of Switzerland," Federal Data Protection and Information Commissioner (FDPIC) Hanspeter Thuer said in a statement on Friday. Street View went live in Switzerland in mid-August, after it had already caused controversy in Britain and raised concerns when vehicles mounted with periscope cameras began shooting images in Germany earlier this year. Google could continue taking photos of roads in Switzerland provided it gave at least a week's notice on where photos would be taken, but would not be allowed to put the images on the Internet until the final court decision, Thuer said. "We are pleased that we have come to this agreement with Mr Thuer, under which we can continue taking photographs forStreet View," said Google's Global Privacy Counsel Peter Fleischer. "However, we will not put online any additional images on Street View until the decision of the Federal Administrative Court." A source close to proceedings said a final court decision was unlikely within the next year. Thuer referred the matter to the country's Federal Administrative Court in November, saying Google had failed to comply with most of his recommendations to protect people's privacy. Google said previously it would not lower the height of the cameras on its vehicles in Switzerland.

Google did this in Japan, but only to preserve image quality since the streets are narrower and houses closer together. Lowering the cameras posed other problems because it brought them closer to people's faces, thecompany said, adding it continually improved the software it used to pick out and blur faces and licence plates automatically.

Google's Chrome Browser Focuses on Speed,

Google threw its hat into the browser ring back in 2008. Chrome is what they called their new product, now available in its third iteration. A beta version of the fourth generation is currently making the rounds as well.

While Chrome itself is clearly rapidly changing, one thing seems constant: the developers at Google have their sights on a portion of the market share held by titans Internet Explorer and Firefox.

Google favours a purist approach, says Claudio Mueller from Germany's Chip magazine: the browser isn't going to score many points for frills, but its speed does turn heads.

"It's trimmed down for that purpose and it beats Internet Explorer and Firefox in that

area," Mueller says. That extra zip is noticeable from the first time the programme is used, especially for complex web 2.0 pages, which load faster than on other browsers.

The core of the approach is the multi-process technology, says Mirko Schubert from online magazine Netzwelt. The rendering and JavaScript engines and plug-ins don't run in sequence as is the case for other browsers. They run parallel to one another. Even if one tab is running slower, it won't bring the entirebrowser to its knees.

Another advantage comes through the memory management, Schubert notes. As soon as a tab is closed, the process is closed with it. Its memory is then available again for use. That's helpful for users who keep a lot ofbrowser windows open at once.

The multi-process architecture also makes it more difficult for malicious software to get a toehold. Browsers where all the tabs work in one process make it easier for malware to make its way into the system, Mueller says. The threat is significantly reduced by the use of individual processes, a system also known as the sandbox principle.

The protection is only effective against certain types of attacks, says Jan Steffan from the Fraunhofer Institute for Secure Information Technology (SIT) in Germany. The damages are limited if a hacker leverages a vulnerability in thebrowser itself. As with all browsers, though, the greater danger may well come through holes in add-in components used to depict web content: Flash player and Silverlight are major culprits here.

There are also disadvantages to keeping the browser overly trim. Several of Chrome's functions are limited to the point of making them useless, Mueller says - such as the print function. A password manager and mouse gesture controls are also missing.

Another annoying omission is the inability to micromanage what JavaScript blocks and what it allows, Mueller says. JavaScript is an almost unavoidable element in the depiction of most pages, but it is a security risk. "Attackers can use malicious script codes to sneak viruses onto the PC or automatically redirect the user onto other dangerous pages," he says.

Google's browser has also drawn criticism for weak data security. Information like web searches are sent to the company with an identification number, Mueller says.

"That's the biggest problem: the user is simply not told which data is transmitted," he adds.

If you're willing to overlook that and enjoy the services of a lean and quick browser, then Chrome is worth installing.
11. Poor iPod touch battery life (originally posted October 25, 2007)

Although this story dates back to 2007, its popularity in 2009 tells an interesting story. Namely that people searched for “iPod touch battery life” on Google a lot in 2009 – where the story comes up fifth. The iPod touch’s battery life was been a popular topic in 2007 when the first generation model got panned in the media (notably by Walt Mossberg) for its poor battery life. The issue spiked again in 2009 when the third generation model came out in September 2009 and people again started searching for ways to extend its battery life.

Apple removed Rosetta from the default installation of Mac OS 10.6 (Snow Leopard) on June 8, 2009. Many people, including myself, panicked when they saw a new dialog box pop up when trying to run a Rosetta app (in my case, the Office 2008 installer). You need to install Rosetta” it taunted. Not wanting anything to slow down my zippy Snow Leopard installation, I was reluctant to. As it turns out, Rosetta is only about 2MB in size, it only runs when needed and has almost-zero impact on performance.

I was all excited by the iPhone 3GS announcement and rushed to place a pre-order — only to discover that I wasn’t eligible for the $199/$299 (plus two-year contract, natch) pricing that Apple advertises. Turns out that iPhone 3G customers have to wait 18 months before being eligible to upgrade to the 3GS at the advertised prices — sometimes less if you’re in a family plan. By the looks of things a lot of people were in the same boat.

macbook-pro-battery-250.jpg
Originally posted in 2006, this post comes up forth on Google when searching for “macbook pro battery recall.” People probably found their way to my four year old post about a battery issue (affecting only the first two weeks of MacBook Pros produced) after search for information about Apple’s controversial new sealed, non-user replaceable batteries.
15. What’s on the Queen’s iPod? (posted April 2, 2009)
http://www.dotpenn.com/images/stories/articles/2009-04/Queen_Elizabeth_Ipod.jpg
Ah royalty, why are we so fascinated by thee? I can’t really say that I am, unless of course we’re talking about royal gadgets. This post was about the royal iPod given to the Queen by President Obama while on an official visit to the UK. What’s more interesting is what’s on Phil Schiller’s iPhone. In an interview with David Pogue Schiller mentioned a few of his favorites, including Shazam, CNN, Facebook, MLB, NBA, ESPN, Eliminate, geoDefense and Best Camera.
http://i.zdnet.com/blogs/apple-sale.jpg
No real surprise here, everyone uses the Internet to look for deals, especially leading up to Black Friday and Cyber Monday. This combined with Apple’s legendary lack of discounting pushed these three retail posts into the Top 20.
What’s that? “Real competition” in the same sentence as “iPhone?” What could be considered sacrilege to many turns out to be a fact. The Droid’s biggest advantages over the iPhone come courtesy of Google’s Android operating system, which graduated to version 2.0 (code named Eclair). Android is maturing quickly and its open platform, background apps, widgets and customization expose many of the chinks in the iPhone’s armor. When you combine Android 2.0 with the new hardware features included in the Droid handset – including its physical keyboard, removable battery, 5MP camera and expansion slot – you have a potent competitor to the iPhone.
http://www.crunchgear.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/01/yellow-snow-warning1.jpg
When Apple released firmware 2.2.1 for the iPhone and iPod touch back in January it broke the iPhone Dev Team’s vaunted yellowsn0w unlock prompting a small panic. While Apple found time to break yellosn0w in the update it didn’t address a long list of missing iPhone features (cut and paste, push notifications, tethering, MMS and A2DP.) Well, at least we have all of those features now.

Clean Up Your Computing

Clean Up Your Computing

The standard 200W PC running for 8 hours a day, 5 days a week, 50 weeks in a year, will use 400 kwh. Maybe not much considering the total energy usage of your household or business, but it's a great place to start cutting your carbon emissions and saving money!

In comparison, the new breed of Green-PC's use an average of 30w, so in comparison to above it would only use 60 kwh. An energy saving of 85%!

Next time you're looking at upgrading your current PC, consider the Eco-Friendly Option. It may mean a slight increase in outlay, but this will be recouped by the saving on your electricity bill!

find out MAC address in Xp

Windows XP

Run ipconfig/all from a Command Prompt window.

(click Start, then Run, then type cmd in the text box.)

Type in ipconfig/all in the Command Prompt Windows.

The 12-digit Physical Address is the same as MAC address



*You will need to register all MAC addresses in cases where you have both wired and wireless interface in your system.

LAMP Vs .NET

I have been working with .NET for past 6 months. I would say that .NET is pretty user friendly and is good for developing windows based applications. It is reasonably good for developing web applications. But it is not platform independent. I feel it has a good cosmetic look and some good documentation in msdn. I would like to know about LAMP.

How is the speed of application development when compared to .NET ?

How user friendly is LAMP ?

How is the documentation ?

How is the stability of the OS and the Apache software ?

How easy are LAMP applications to debug ?

What is the market share of LAMP in web applications ?

How is the future trend going to be for LAMP ?

What is the technical support available in case of problems ?

What are the advantages , limitations when compared to windows ?

I would love to have some discussion on these items. Please get me some inputs.

LAMP

LAMP is a set of free softwares that assists us in setting up a web-server cost effectively and reliably.

LAMP contains the following softwares:
Linux - Operating System
Apache - Web server
MySql - DBMS
Perl/PHP/Python - Scripting language.

It should be noted that all of the above is open source technologies.

LAMP is a revolutionary open source web platform

We would deal with Installation, using scripts to create website and management of the installed server.